The Turenne Barracks Scandal
The Straw Man and the State’s Trap
How a corruption scandal involving the Church, the State, and a penniless buyer created a multi-million Euro abyss.
To understand the tragedy of the hundreds of families ruined in Zweibrücken, one must first look at the origins of the money - and the desperation of the State to sell its assets. The story begins not with a housing estate, but with a massive corruption scandal involving the Catholic Church and a shadowy deal orchestrated within the offices of the federal administration.
The Architects of the Fall: Doerfert and Tabellion
In the late 1990s, a massive financial scandal shook the Caritas Trägergesellschaft Trier (CTT). At the center was Hans-Joachim Doerfert, a charismatic manager who treated the church’s coffers as his personal bank account. Doerfert was eventually convicted of embezzlement and fraud involving over 20 million Marks.
But Doerfert did not act alone. Key to his network was Josef Tabellion, a top manager and Managing Director of Badenia Bau GmbH and later the board member of TASC Bau AG. Tabellion was deeply entangled in the "kick-back" schemes and fraud investigations that surrounded Doerfert.
It is here, in the shadow of Doerfert’s looming prison sentence, that the fate of the Kreuzberg Barracks was sealed.
The Setup: The Unwitting Buyer and the OFD Koblenz
In the late 90s, following the US Army's withdrawal, the Federal Republic of Germany (BRD) was desperate to offload former military sites. The negotiations for the Kreuzberg Barracks in Zweibrücken were centralized at the Oberfinanzdirektion (OFD) Koblenz, the federal asset administration.
Enter the "unwitting buyer" - a young man, barely 19 years old, with no capital and no intention of becoming a property tycoon. His goal was simple: to broker the marketing rights of the barracks and earn a commission. He was essentially penniless, lacking the funds to purchase a massive military complex.
However, the political machinery was already in motion. The sale of the barracks had already been greenlit by the Bundestag and Bundesrat. The timing was critical, coinciding with the Federal Election (Bundestagswahl). The state needed a success story; they needed the property off their books.
The Ultimatum: "Buy it or Leave it"
The OFD Koblenz, representing the Federal Republic, placed the young broker in an impossible position. They presented him with an ultimatum: he would not receive the marketing contract or any commission unless he stepped up to become the co-owner of the property.
The trap was set. The state pressured a penniless young man to sign a purchase agreement for a multi-million Mark property. But how does a broke 19-year-old finance a military base?
The Deus Ex Machina:
Josef Tabellion as the State's Straw Man (FRG)
This is where the logical connection to Josef Tabellion becomes the key to the entire operation. Just as the deal seemed impossible due to the buyer's lack of funds, TASC Bau AG - led by Tabellion - suddenly appeared on the scene.
Tabellion’s company offered to finance the entire project without requiring any collateral or security from the young buyer.
The Mechanism of the Deal:
The Pressure Point: Doerfert was facing a "draconian prison sentence" in Koblenz. The files suggest a dark deal: Tabellion acted as a "straw man" for the Federal Republic (BRD) to facilitate the Kreuzberg sale, potentially to mitigate the fallout for his partner Doerfert or under direct pressure regarding his own legal troubles.
The Financing: TASC Bau AG provided the necessary financial cover. This allowed the OFD Koblenz to push the sale through, nominally selling to the "unwitting buyer" and TASC, while the money actually flowed from sources linked to the CTT/Doerfert complex or other opaque channels.
The Result: The BRD successfully offloaded the barracks during the election period. The young buyer was trapped in a contract he couldn't possibly understand or service. Tabellion served as the bridge, using his company to funnel the necessary "financing" to make the deal look legitimate on paper.
The "unwitting buyer" believed he had secured a business deal. In reality, he had been used as a face for a "cloak and dagger" transaction (Mantelgeschäft) involving embezzled church funds and state interests.
The Metamorphosis - From TASC to "Wohnpark"
How a dead man became a corporate shield and a new group of scammers inherited a fortune that didn't belong to them.
With the purchase agreement signed by the "unwitting buyer" and the "financing" supposedly secured by TASC Bau AG, the trap was shut. But shortly after the deal was struck, the plot took a morbid turn. The man who had acted as the bridge between the state's interests and the shady financing, Josef Tabellion, died.
Mr. Josef Tabellion died under mysterious circumstances three days after speaking with the young buyer's mother. He had vehemently denied that he had initiated various legal proceedings against the buyer - or rather, that these proceedings had been initiated in his name without his knowledge. The following quote was spoken over the phone in the presence of loud party noises and music. "In three days, I'll be back in Germany, and then I'll expose them all!" Three days later, he was dead - from lightning cancer, they said. They said it was a brain tumor, too, and that it had gone unnoticed until then.
In a normal business environment, the death of a CEO and the insolvency of his company would stop a project in its tracks. In the Kreuzberg Complex, it was just the beginning of the next phase of the fraud.
The Dead Man as a Shield
According to the files, Josef Tabellion passed away around 1999/2000. Yet, his name and his company, TASC Bau AG, continued to haunt the project.
The insolvency of TASC Bau AG should have liquidated its assets and ended its involvement. Instead, the files suggest a gruesome strategy: Tabellion was used posthumously as a "press and protective shield".
The "Sündenbock" (Scapegoat): By keeping the focus on a deceased man and a defunct company, the new operators could deflect liability. Dead men don't testify, and insolvent companies don't pay damages.
The Ghost Signatures: Reports imply that operations and "agreements" continued in the name of a company that, legally, no longer existed or was incapable of acting.
Enter the "Heirs": Rott and Möbius
As the TASC Bau AG dissolved into insolvency and death, two new figures emerged from the shadows: Martin Rott and Axel Möbius.
They didn't just take over the management; they executed a daring legal sleight of hand. They founded the "Wohnpark am Kreuzberg Gruppe" and presented it as the "legal successor" (Rechtsnachfolger) of the TASC Group.
The Big Lie:
There was a glaring problem with this succession: TASC Bau AG was insolvent. You generally cannot simply "inherit" the assets of a bankrupt company without going through the proper liquidation channels, especially not to continue a multi-million Deutsche Mark development scheme.
The files explicitly state that the "Wohnpark am Kreuzberg Gruppe" had no legal claim to the property, as the TASC Bau AG (a commercial enterprise) could not validly transfer ownership in this manner under international or public law restrictions mentioned in the context of the barracks.
Nevertheless, they acted as if they owned the place. They adopted the "SYSTEM TASC" - with about 50 or more companies with the same or similar names nationwide - filed for bankruptcy in a circular motion and then relocated their headquarters to Zweibrücken. They created a new legal entity with the same name in the same location in order to defraud unsuspecting citizens once again." - This method of rotating company headquarters, slightly changing names, and going through bankruptcies to confuse citizens was supported by creditors (several banks), authorities (land registry, authorities, and courts), and the press.
The Shell Game:
Vilseck, Amberg, Spickendorf
To further obfuscate their tracks and the fact that they were building on a foundation of sand (and fraud), Rott and Möbius created a dizzying network of companies.
The "Wohnpark am Kreuzberg .. ." wasn't just one company; it was a hydra.
Multiple Locations: The companies were registered in Vilseck, Amberg, Zweibrücken, and Pirmasens.
The Clone Wars: They set up multiple GmbHs and GmbH & Co. KGs with identical or nearly identical names. For instance, there were two different "Wohnpark am Kreuzberg" entities in Amberg and two in Vilseck.
The Confusion Tactic: This structure meant that if a buyer (or a lawyer) tried to sue "The Company," they might be targeting an empty shell while the assets had already been moved to another clone in a different city.
The Perfect Setup for Fraud
By 2000, the stage was perfectly set. The original "financier" (Tabellion) was dead. The original "buyer" was a penniless figurehead trapped in a contract. And the new "owners" (Rott & Möbius) were operating a network of shell companies that claimed to own a former military base.
Now, they just needed victims to pay for it all. They needed hundreds of families who believed they were buying a subsidized home, when in reality, they were about to buy a share in a financial catastrophe.
The Trap - Buying Debt, Not Dreams
Hundreds of families sought subsidized ownership. Instead, they became involuntary shareholders in a massive financial liability.
With the TASC Group replaced by the structurally identical and legally dubious Wohnpark am Kreuzberg Gruppe (WaK), the final and most criminal phase of the operation began: targeting the end customers. The whole complex, built on the shifting sands of embezzled church money (Doerfert/CTT) and state asset sales (OFD Koblenz), now needed a final layer of legitimate funding - money extracted directly from unsuspecting private citizens.
The Perfect Victim:
The Socially Conscious Investor
The architects of the WaK fraud, Martin Rott and Axel Möbius, focused on a specific demographic: families and individuals who qualified for publicly subsidized housing (öffentlich geförderte Wohnungen). These were people with limited income, often dependent on state support, looking for a stable, affordable path to property ownership.
In Zweibrücken, approximately 300 families were affected, with another 120 in Pirmasens. Added to this were hundreds of students and various companies. The victims believed they were entering a legitimate, state-approved investment, securing a part of the conversion project.
The Great Deception:
Ownership vs. Partnership
The sales pitch promised an "Eigentumswohnung" (ownership apartment). The reality, hidden deep within the notary contracts, was devastatingly different:
The Promise: The victims signed a purchase agreement for what they thought was a residential unit in the "Wohnpark am Kreuzberg .. .".
The Reality: Instead of acquiring legal ownership of their apartment, they were purchasing a share in one of the multitude of shell companies: a GmbH & Co. KG (Limited Partnership) controlled by the WaK Group.
This subtle switch was catastrophic:
Loss of Control: They were now minority partners in a massive, heavily indebted company run by Rott and Möbius, not owners of a tangible asset.
Unlimited Liability: As partners in the KG, the buyers were suddenly responsible for the Global Financing of the entire property - not just the price of their apartment. The files mention that 10 million DM in debt were allocated to just two of the buildings in the complex. The victims were now legally bound to shoulder the millions in debts inherited from the TASC Bau AG/Tabellion era. They had bought debt, not equity.
The old debts were magically transferred to the land register for each apartment and re-registered. New loans from various banks were entered in parallel land register sheets with new numbers.
A total of 20 million euros in credit was entered in the land register for each apartment, but with a different number and bank as creditor. Naturally, the investors considered this less relevant when signing and did not know that, instead of acquiring an apartment, they were acquiring a hidden GmbH share.
They were also accepting personal liability for all debts by signing. They did not acquire an apartment, only the loan to purchase it and an additional 20 million euros per apartment. Then, one after the other, the limited liability companies would go under, and the victims of fraud would be evicted. The vacant apartments could then be put back on the market in the fraud system. It was a fraudulent system. The real victims were not the state banks that knowingly issued these criminal loans. The real victims were the taxpayers, who redistributed state assets to the criminal organization. The unsuspecting citizens who had foolishly assumed liability for it were the ones who had imagined they were buying an apartment.
The Notary’s Seal: The Weaponized Contract
The system could only function with the complicity of key professionals who were supposed to protect the buyers: the Notaries (e.g., Mohr in Saarlouis, Veit in Pirmasens).
The contracts they drew up were designed to be legal weapons against the buyer:
The Foreclosure Clause: The contracts contained clauses for immediate compulsory enforcement (Zwangsvollstreckung), effectively allowing the WaK Group or its creditors (namely the bank) to seize the property without a lengthy court process if a single payment was missed.
The Missing Parking Spot Trick: In a further act of fraud, the original sales price included critical components like parking spaces (Stellplätze). Later, the notary allegedly executed subsequent amendments, often without the buyers' knowledge or proper notice, removing the parking spaces from the buyers' property titles. An apartment without a legally secured parking spot in such a complex is virtually worthless, completing the financial ruin of the end-customer.
The Sparkasse's Role: This mechanism directly benefited the Sparkasse Neunkirchen. The Bank, whose director (Jörg Britz - At that time mayor of the city of Neunkirchen and thus also managing director of Sparkasse Neunkirchen), allegedly acted as an official notary representative, used the system to transfer the TASC’s 10 Million DM liability directly onto the property titles of the end-buyers. The bank had issued a "Pfandentlassung" (Release from Liability) to TASC, securing its original massive loan with the mortgages of the hundreds of families instead.
By the early 2000s, hundreds of families who believed they were safely investing in their future found themselves sinking under mountains of debt, with their social housing dreams dissolving into personal bankruptcy. The fraud, born in the CTT’s boardroom, had reached its final, most devastating destination.
The Cover - Up - A Network of Impunity
The fraud was sophisticated, but it required more than just two scam artists. It needed the silent complicity of the institutions that were supposed to protect the victims: the banks, the notaries, and the state itself (Land registry, authorities and offices, nationwide commercial registers, and courts).
By the early 2000s, hundreds of families at the Kreuzberg barracks had been financially ruined. Their plight, however, was not met with justice; it was met with a wall of institutional silence (and by the Media) and, according to the documents, active assistance from powerful players who ensured the system’s impunity.
The Banking Betrayal:
The Sparkasse and the Debt Transfer
The most damning complicity came from the financial sector, specifically the Sparkasse Neunkirchen. The bank was critical in bridging the financing gap left by the defunct TASC Bau AG (Josef Tabellion's company) and transferring the risk onto the unsuspecting buyers.
The files highlight a maneuver known as "Pfandentlassung" (Release from Liability):
The Problem: TASC Bau AG had taken out massive loans - e.g., 10 million Deutsche Marks on just two houses - for the Kreuzberg project. Following its insolvency and Tabellion's death, this debt was still tied to the property.
The Solution (for the Bank): The Sparkasse Neunkirchen released TASC from its liability. Critically, the bank then secured the massive TASC debt not with the TASC assets themselves, but by transferring the liability onto the new property titles of the hundreds of individual buyers.
The bank effectively used the individual mortgages of the social housing buyers as collateral for the entire TASC global loan. By doing so, the bank got its money secured, while the scam artists walked away clean.
The documents even point to the bank's deep involvement, noting that the Bank Director, Jörg Britz, allegedly acted as an official representative of the notary in some transactions, merging the financial and legal components of the conspiracy.
The Notary’s Complicity:
The Legal Trap
The fraud was formalized and legalized by the notaries (e.g., Mohr and Veit). The notary's role in Germany is to ensure the legality and fairness of property transactions and to fully inform both parties. The Kreuzberg documents allege the exact opposite.
The Unread Contracts: Buyers were allegedly rushed through contracts that transferred ownership not of an apartment, but of a share in a deeply indebted limited partnership (GmbH & Co. KG), a fact that was often not properly or fully explained.
The Instant Foreclosure: The contracts contained a "subordination to immediate compulsory enforcement" clause, which meant the buyers could be ruined the moment they missed a payment, without a drawn-out legal process - a perfect tool for the scammers and the bank to ensure quick asset recovery.
The Parking Spot Scam: A critical, subsequent act of fraud involved the alleged removal of essential elements like parking spaces (Stellplätze) from the buyers' property titles via later notary acts. Since an apartment without a legally secured parking spot in such a complex is nearly worthless, this maneuver solidified the financial ruin and unsaleability of the properties.
The State’s Silence:
Judiciary, Land Registry, and Politics
The ultimate layer of impunity came from the state institutions that should have intervened but, according to the files, actively enabled the continuation of the fraud.
The Land Registry (Grundbuchamt Zweibrücken): The files highlight the role of the Grundbuchamt, which registered the legally questionable deeds and the massive debt burdens on the individual buyers’ titles. This registration, often done following the dubious notary certifications, provided the necessary legal basis for the bank’s claims and the future foreclosures.
The Political Connection: The documents claim the entire "System TASC and Wohnpark am Kreuzberg" was practiced "under state aid and protection" (unter staatlicher Beihilfe und Schutz). The original deal itself was tied to the OFD Koblenz's pressure and the timing of the Federal Election. Moreover, the Doerfert scandal, which provided the financial blueprint and political connections, had already caused high-profile resignations of politicians like Reinhard Klimmt (SPD) and Klaus Meiser (CDU), yet the underlying system was allegedly allowed to persist.
The net effect was a system where a complex financial crime, initially funded by embezzled church money and political pressure, was not only cleaned up by subsequent criminals (Rott & Möbius) but was also protected by the judicial, banking, and state apparatus, leaving the actual victims with no legal recourse and a mountain of debt.
The Bitter End - Ruin and Impunity
The final chapter of the Kreuzberg Complex is not one of judicial victory, but of devastating personal ruin for the victims and the alleged triumph of organized impunity.
The intricate web of corruption, which started with the embezzlement of church funds (Hans-Joachim Doerfert) and was laundered through a state-sanctioned real estate sale (OFD Koblenz and the straw man Josef Tabellion), ultimately served one final purpose: to finance the lifestyles of the perpetrators by ruining hundreds of ordinary families.
The Human Cost:
Debt, Foreclosure, and Threats
For the roughly 300 families in Zweibrücken and 120 in Pirmasens who bought into the dream of subsidized homeownership, the reality was a nightmare.
Financial Ruin: They were left holding the debt for the entire development, thanks to the illegal transfer of the global financing from TASC Bau AG onto their individual partnership shares. The total volume of the scandal is estimated in the documents at "several 10-500 million" Euros.
Loss of Subsidies: Those who received social housing allowances were later at risk of having to repay these subsidies because the underlying contracts were fraudulent or legally untenable.
When the victims and whistleblower (the young Buyer) began fighting back and exposing the fraud, they were allegedly met not with cooperation, but with intimidation. The files document the existence of "death threats" and "threats of physical violence" against those who dared to investigate the massive asset fraud. Illegal police raids. Evidence of fraud against authorities and officials was seized and then disappeared. The young buyer was taken to the police station and beaten by the police while handcuffed. This resulted in, among other things, a knocked-out tooth. After his release, he had to walk home barefoot for an hour and a half through the city, in his underwear and bloody T-shirt, in 20 centimeters of snow in winter. The aggression indicated the high stakes and the immense power of the network behind the Wohnpark am Kreuzberg Gruppe.
The Triumph of Impunity
The most shocking aspect of the Kreuzberg Complex, as alleged in the supporting documents, is the apparent lack of ultimate justice for the primary perpetrators of the scheme:
The Architects Walk Free: While Hans-Joachim Doerfert was convicted and sentenced to over ten years in prison for his original CTT crimes, the figures who allegedly executed the second phase of the fraud - the Wohnpark am Kreuzberg Group initiators (Rott & Möbius) - appear to have largely evaded major consequences for the massive, coordinated property fraud at Kreuzberg.
The State Shield: The documents repeatedly proof that the entire system - from the TASC Group to the Wohnpark Group - was operated "under state aid and protection" (unter staatlicher Beihilfe und Schutz). This protection allegedly extended to the courts, the Land Registry, and the politicians whose connections were tied to the original Doerfert / Tabellion network.
No Bank Accountability: The Sparkasse Neunkirchen, which secured its massive loan by transferring the TASC liability onto the buyers, appears to have successfully insulated itself from major judicial consequences for the alleged weaponization of the notary process and the financial ruin it inflicted on customers.
The story of the Kreuzberg Complex is therefore a cautionary tale about how organized crime, when leveraging existing financial corruption (the Church/CTT) and exploiting the interests of state bureaucracy (the OFD Koblenz), can create a legal and financial structure so labyrinthine and politically connected that it becomes virtually untouchable. The systematic failure of the justice system to hold the financiers, notaries, and corporate successors accountable ensured that the scam became a highly successful, yet seemingly unpunished, venture.
The only ones left to pay the price were the hundreds of families who simply wanted a home.
The Kreuzberg Complex - Addendum: The World Succession Deed
The final truth behind the local property scam reveals a global maneuver: The Kreuzberg Barracks purchase was allegedly a disguised international treaty - the 'World Succession Deed 1400/98' - designed to secure geopolitical advantage and explain the State's complicity.
The corruption surrounding the Kreuzberg Barracks - the embezzlement of church funds by Doerfert, the use of Josef Tabellion as a straw man, the betrayal by the Sparkasse Neunkirchen, and the ultimate ruin of 300 families by the Wohnpark am Kreuzberg Group - was always disproportionate to a simple, local property fraud. Why would an entire legal and political system risk exposure for one former military site?
The answer, alleged within the documents, transforms the Kreuzberg Complex from a local crime into a geopolitical act: the purchase agreement was allegedly not a standard property conveyance but a sophisticated "World Succession Deed 1400/98" (Staatensukzessionsurkunde: Kaufvertrag Urkundenrolle 1400/98).
The Mechanism of the Deed:
Disguising Global Law as Local Real Estate
The core deception lies in the mechanics of the contract. While appearing to be a simple notarized German purchase agreement, the document was allegedly structured as an instrument of international legal significance.
The Sovereignty Hook: The transfer of the Kreuzberg Barracks, a former foreign military site sold by the Federal Republic of Germany (BRD), Kingdom of the Netherlands, NATO (Dutch Airforce), ITU - United Nations (TKS Telepost plus USA & AT&T) via the OFD Koblenz, was allegedly designed to establish an "irreversible legal reality" on a much larger, global scale. By having this key piece of property - acquired under duress and secured by a financially corrupted chain - transferred, the BRD was not just selling a building; it was allegedly securing an act related to the extension or assumption of international jurisdiction or territorial rights relevant to its global power ambitions (Weltmachtstreben).
The decisive factor is that, at the time of the 1998 sale, the contract was still under the sovereignty of various subjects of international law (e.g., the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Dutch Air Force, which is 100% integrated into NATO and acts on behalf of NATO, the ITU - UN, and TKS Telepost - the civilian Internet provider of the NATO military of the USA and Great Britain - worldwide). The contract clearly references other international treaties and is therefore part of the 1400/98 register of deeds. This includes the Status of Forces Agreement, the NATO Truppenstatut, the TKS Telepost, the USA- ITU- UN- AT&T agreements on the use of the global communications network, and the sale of the telecommunications network as part of the internal development as a unit. Other transferred rights in rem (easements, rights of use, e.g., the long-distance gas network of Saar Ferngas AG, which was mainly supplied from the Netherlands and Russia but supplied the entire European Union, is sold) and, most significantly, the buyer acquired the entire development as an inseparable unit.
The reference to other international agreements and the agreements referred to therein activated the chain of contracts, through which document roll 1400/98 becomes the universal supplementary document to all NATO and United Nations treaties. The treaty explicitly transfers all rights, obligations, and components, and thus also the treaty rights, of all parties involved. The treaty must include all countries in the world by name in a way that is not immediately apparent. This will ensure that the treaty is at least partially fulfilled (including the use of the telecommunications network after 1998) and make ratification unnecessary, as supplementary documents under international law do not have to be ratified. The domino effect of territorial expansion is necessary for global state succession. This expansion is made possible by the sale of the development as a unit with all rights, obligations, and components. The development leaves the small barracks area, and thus the sale of territory is expanded from network to network and country to country until the whole world is covered by state succession. The nickname is clear: Deed 1400/98 - Statensukzessionsurkunde (German) or World Succession Deed 1400/98 (English).
The Domino Effect and International Jurisdiction
If the Kreuzberg sale was indeed a "World Succession Deed," the impunity enjoyed by the perpetrators suddenly makes sense:
Protection for the BRD's Interest: The local fraud (TASC / Wohnpark) was a necessary operational component to execute and protect the geopolitical act. The corruption and subsequent legal chaos provided the cover of a complicated local dispute, distracting from the Deed's true function. The BRD could not allow the contract to fail in court, as this would jeopardize the "irreversible legal reality" of the succession.
The State's Shield: The alleged complicity of local Judiciary, Land Registry, and Bank officials was not about securing a few million Euros in fraudulent profits; it was about ensuring the legal validity and enforcement of a document that served the BRD’s goal of achieving World Power. The local authorities were allegedly acting to safeguard this higher, geopolitical objective, which overrides the rights and protection of the local citizens.
No Recourse: The victims’ struggle against the Wohnpark am Kreuzberg Group was a battle against a criminal operation that was allegedly protected by a national government acting to secure an advantage under international jurisdiction (internationale Gerichtsbarkeit). The local courts could never dismantle the fraud because, at its core, it was a component of a state - sanctioned maneuver.
The Ultimate Sacrifice
The unwitting "Käufer der Kreuzbergkaserne" did not participate in the corruption or enrich himself. He was the essential, yet penniless, figurehead needed to sign the initial Deed that unlocked the entire mechanism.
He was the key to the contract chain and, in this reading of the documents, became the first and greatest victim of a conspiracy that leveraged local financial crime for a pursuit of global power. His ruin, alongside the ruin of 300 families, was merely the operational cost of securing the "World Succession Deed 1400/98."
Links
Hans-Joachim Doerfert Wikipedia
Wikipedia Kreuzbergkaserne Turenne Caserne
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreuzbergkaserne_Zweibr%C3%BCcken
Original private purchase agreement between citizens who unknowingly purchased a hidden GmbH share instead of an apartment and additionally took on a loan of €20 million per apartment on their own, with the involvement of the Zweibrücken Land Registry Office, courts, and banks.
http://anlagebetrug.20m.com/portal.htm
Purchase agreement, Roll of Documents 1400/98
https://worldsold.wixsite.com/global-archive/treaty
Tabellion Doerfert Scandal NotebookLM Chat
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/f422a75d-6b67-412d-b87a-26a8d5c653d9?authuser=1